{"id":17605,"date":"2020-03-06T13:45:19","date_gmt":"2020-03-06T18:45:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/caloriecontrol.org\/?p=17605"},"modified":"2020-07-07T14:47:51","modified_gmt":"2020-07-07T18:47:51","slug":"observational-study-finds-no-association-between-lncs-beverages-the-development-of-dyslipidemia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/caloriecontrol.org\/observational-study-finds-no-association-between-lncs-beverages-the-development-of-dyslipidemia\/","title":{"rendered":"Observational Study Finds No Association between LNCS Beverages and the Development of Dyslipidemia"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Some Changes\nReported in Lipoprotein Concentrations but More Research is Needed<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Evidence from observational\nstudies suggests that there is a positive association between added sugar\nintake and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).1-3<\/sup> To help minimize\nthis risk, 100% fruit juice and low- and no-calorie sweetened beverages (LCSB)\nare commonly-used alternatives to sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). However, research\nregarding potential associations between these alternatives and CVD risk are\ninconclusive. There is also limited available data on the prospective\nrelationship between the overall consumption of these beverages and plasma\nlipid and lipoprotein concentrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n