Hydrogenated starch hydrolysates (HSH), including hydrogenated glucose syrups, maltitol syrups, and sorbitol syrups, are a family of products found in a wide variety of foods. They serve a number of functional roles, including use as bulk sweeteners, viscosity or bodying agents, humectants, crystallization modifiers, cryoprotectants and rehydration aids. They also can serve as sugar-free carriers for flavors, colors and enzymes. HSH were developed by a Swedish company in the 1960’s and have been used by the food industry for many years, especially in confectionery products.<\/p>\n
HSH are produced by the partial hydrolysis of corn, wheat or potato starch and subsequent hydrogenation of the hydrolysate at high temperature under pressure. The end product is an ingredient composed of sorbitol, maltitol and higher hydrogenated saccharides (maltitriitol and others). By varying the conditions and extent of hydrolysis, the relative occurrence of various mono-, di-, oligo- and polymeric hydrogenated saccharides in the resulting product can be obtained. A wide range of polyols (also known as sugar alcohols) that can satisfy varied requirements with respect to different levels of sweetness, viscosity and humectancy can, therefore, be produced.<\/p>\n
The term “hydrogenated starch hydrolysate” can correctly be applied to any polyol produced by the hydrogenation of the saccharide products of starch hydrolysis. In practice, however, certain polyols such as sorbitol, mannitol and maltitol are referred to by their common chemical names. “Hydrogenated starch hydrolysate” is more commonly used to describe the broad group of polyols that contain substantial quantities of hydrogenated oligo- and polysaccharides in addition to any monomeric or dimeric polyols (sorbitol\/mannitol or maltitol, respectively).<\/p>\n
The broad term HSH does not differentiate polyols having, for example, different levels of sweetness nor does it identify the principle polyol in the HSH. Common names for major HSH subgroups have, therefore, been developed. These common names are generally based on the most prevalent polyol comprising the HSH. For example, polyols containing sorbitol as the majority (50 percent or more) component are called sorbitol syrups; those with maltitol as the majority component are called maltitol syrups, maltitol solutions or hydrogenated glucose syrups. Polyols that do not contain a specific polyol as the majority component continue to be referred to by the general term “hydrogenated starch hydrolysate.”<\/p>\n
In the United States, HSH are provided by three manufacturers; Ingredion, Roquette America, Inc. and Archer Daniels Midland Company (ADM). Product examples of maltitol syrups include Corn Products Specialty Ingredients’ MaltiSweet \u2122 3145 which is approximately 65 percent maltitol and Hystar\u00ae 5875 which is 60 percent maltitol and Roquette’s Lycasin\u00ae 80\/55 which is 55 percent maltitol. Sorbitol syrups include Roquette’s 70\/100 which is 75 percent sorbitol, Corn Products Specialty Ingredients’ Sorbo 70% and A-625 which contain 70 percent sorbitol and ADM’s sorbitol syrup, called Sorbitol Solution, Noncrystallizing, NF, which is 70 percent sorbitol. Examples of products called by the general term HSH include Roquette’s 75\/400 and Corn Products Specialty Ingredients’ Hystar\u00ae 33\/75. Corn Products Specialty Ingredients also markets Liquid HSH (Stabilite\u00ae ) and a powdered HSH (Stabilite\u00ae SD) through its joint venture with Grain Processing Corporation, Innova.<\/p>\n
HSH are outsta![\"\"](\"http:\/\/caloriecontrol.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/AdobeStock_188725706-scaled-e1657910497548-300x166.jpeg\")
nding humectants which do not crystallize, enabling the production of sugar-free confections with the same cooking and handling systems used to produce sugar candies. These products are used extensively in confections, baked goods, a broad range of other foods, dentifrices and mouthwashes.<\/p>\n
HSH are nutritive sweeteners that provide 40 to 90 percent of the sweetness of sugar. Being polyols, HSH are not sugars and are used to provide sweetness, texture and bulk to a variety of sugarless products. Unlike sugars, HSH are not readily fermented by oral bacteria and are used to formulate sugarless products that do not promote dental caries.<\/p>\n
HSH are also more slowly absorbed in the digestive tract. A portion of HSH may be enzymatically hydrolyzed in the body to sorbitol, maltitol and glucose, however, this process is slow. Therefore, HSH have a reduced glycemic potential relative to glucose for individuals with and without diabetes. Since HSH are more slowly absorbed, a portion of HSH in a food reaches the lower digestive tract where it is metabolized by naturally occurring colonic bacteria. This results in a reduction in the available calories and permits its use as a reduced calorie alternative to sugar.<\/p>\n
Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) affirmation petitions for HSH have been accepted for filing by the Food and Drug Administration. This allows manufacturers to produce and sell foods containing these sweeteners in the United States.<\/p>\n
Polyols, including HSH, are resistant to metabolism by oral bacteria that break down sugars and starches to release acids that may lead to cavities or erode tooth enamel. They are, therefore, non-cariogenic. The usefulness of polyols as alternatives to sugars and as a part of a comprehensive program including proper dental hygiene has been recognized by the\u00a0American Dental Association<\/a>.<\/p>\n Control of blood glucose, lipids and weight are the three major goals in diabetes management today. HSH absorption is slow and incomplete. Therefore, the rise in blood glucose and insulin response associated with the ingestion of glucose is significantly reduced when HSH are used as alternative sweeteners. The reduced caloric value (75 percent, or less, that of sugar) of HSH is consistent with the objective of weight control. Products in which HSH replace sugar may, therefore, be of use providing a wider variety of reduced calorie and sugar-free choices to people with diabetes.<\/p>\n Recognizing that diabetes is complex and requirements for its management may vary between individuals, the usefulness of HSH should be discussed between individuals and their physicians. Foods sweetened with HSH products may contain other ingredients that also contribute calories and other nutrients. These must be considered in meal planning.<\/p>\n Absorption of HSH by the body is slow, allowing a portion of HSH to reach the large intestine where metabolism yields fewer calories. Therefore, unlike sugar that contributes 4 calories per gram, the caloric contribution of HSH is not more than 3 calories per gram. For a product to qualify as “reduced calorie” in the United States, it must have at least a 25 percent reduction in calories. HSH may, therefore, be of use in formulating reduced calorie food products.<\/p>\n The lower caloric value of HSH and other polyols is recognized in other countries. For example, the European Union has provided a Nutritional Labeling Directive stating that all polyols, including HSH, have a caloric value of 2.4 calories per gram.<\/p>\n The safety of HSH products and their components is substantiated by a broad range of safety studies in man and animals, including long term feeding, multigeneration reproduction and teratology studies.<\/p>\n The Joint Food and Agriculture Organization\/World Health Organization Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) has reviewed the safety information and concluded that maltitol syrups are safe. JECFA established an acceptable daily intake (ADI) for “maltitol syrup” of “not specified,” meaning no limits are placed on its use. An ADI of “not specified” is the safest category in which JECFA can place a food ingredient. JECFA’s decisions are often adopted by many small countries that do not have their own agencies to review food additive safety. In 1984, the Scientific Committee for Food of the European Union evaluated maltitol syrups and concluded it was not necessary to set an ADI for maltitol syrups.<\/p>\n In the United States, Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) petitions for HSH products have been accepted for filing. Once a GRAS affirmation petition has been accepted for filing, food manufacturers may use the ingredient. Products from the HSH family are approved in many other countries, including Canada, Japan and Australia.<\/p>\n HSH, although less sweet than sucrose, blend well with other sweeteners and flavors and can mask unpleasant off-flavors such as bitter notes. HSH products are synergistic with low-calorie sweeteners. Applications for HSH include confectionaries, baked goods, icings and frozen desserts. In baked goods, for example, HSH products not only offer sweetness but also moisture control, texture improvement, crystallization inhibition, less browning (allowing less chance of burning), stability improvement with extended shelf life and flavor improvement.<\/p>\n Health conscious Americans continue to demand additional good-tasting products with less calories and fat. A wide variety of low-calorie and reduced-calorie ingredients can provide products with improved taste and texture, increased stability and more choices for the consumer. The availability of various low-calorie and reduced-calorie ingredients allows food manufacturers to choose the most appropriate ingredient, or combination of ingredients, for a given product. Recent research shows that more than l00 million Americans consume low-calorie products. Over half of these consumers would like additional low-calorie products to be available. The primary interest is in desserts and sweets, including baked goods, candy, chocolates and ice cream. HSH can be helpful in making many of these products possible.<\/p>\n Hydrogenated starch hydrolysates (HSH), including hydrogenated glucose syrups, maltitol syrups, and sorbitol syrups, are a family of products found in a wide variety of foods. They serve a number of functional roles, including use as bulk sweeteners, viscosity or bodying agents, humectants, crystallization modifiers, cryoprotectants and rehydration aids. They also can serve as sugar-free carriers […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17793,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[85,8],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nUse in the Diet of People with Diabetes<\/h2>\n
Reduced-Calorie Alternatives to Sugar<\/h2>\n
Safety<\/h2>\n
Multiple Ingredient Approach to Calorie Control<\/h2>\n
Future<\/h2>\n
For more information visit polyols.org<\/a>.<\/h2>\n
References<\/h6>\n
Commission of the European Communities. Reports of the Scientific Committee for Food concerning sweeteners. Sixteenth Series. Report EUR 10210 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1985.<\/h6>\n
Eberhardt, L. Hydrogenated Starch Hydrolysates and Maltitol Syrups. In: Alternative Sweeteners, Third Edition, Lyn O’Brien Nabors, ed., Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 2001.<\/h6>\n
European Economic Community Council (EEC). 1990. Directive on food labeling. Official Journal of the European Communities. No. L 276\/40 (Oct. 6).<\/h6>\n
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. The evaluation of the energy of certain polyols used as food ingredients. June 1994. (unpublished)<\/h6>\n
Havenaar, R. Dental advantages of some bulk sweeteners in laboratory animal trials. In: Developments in Sweeteners–3, T.H. Grenby, ed., Elsevier-Applied Science Publishers, London and New York, 1987.<\/h6>\n
Joint FAO\/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants: maltitol and maltitol syrup. Forty-first report. WHO Technical Report Series 837, pp. 16-17. Geneva, 1993.`<\/h6>\n
Modderman, J.P. Safety assessment of hydrogenated starch hydrolysates. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 18:80-114, 1993.<\/h6>\n
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Lonza, Inc.; Filing of petition for affirmation of GRAS status (hydrogenated starch hydrolysate). Federal Register, Vol. 51, No. 68:12212, April 9, 1986.<\/h6>\n
U. S. Food and Drug Administration. Roquette Corp.; Filling of petition for affirmation of GRAS status (hydrogenated glucose sirup). Federal Register, Vol. 49, No. 39:7153, February 27, 1984.<\/h6>\n
Wheeler, M.L., et al. Metabolic response to oral challenge of hydrogenated starch hydrolysate versus glucose in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 13:733-740, 1990.<\/h6>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"