{"id":16221,"date":"2017-12-13T19:17:33","date_gmt":"2017-12-14T00:17:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/caloriecontrol.org\/?p=16221"},"modified":"2019-05-16T09:28:57","modified_gmt":"2019-05-16T13:28:57","slug":"role-low-calorie-sweeteners-prevention-management-overweight-obesity-evidence-v-conjecture","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/caloriecontrol.org\/role-low-calorie-sweeteners-prevention-management-overweight-obesity-evidence-v-conjecture\/","title":{"rendered":"The role of low-calorie sweeteners in the prevention and management of overweight and obesity"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"\"\"<\/a>December 13, 2017 — A recent review<\/a> published in Proceedings of the Nutrition Society<\/em> examined the results of intervention studies to determine if claims undermining the theory that low-calorie sweeteners affect calorie intake, and thus body weight, are substantiated scientifically. [Peter J. Rogers, University of Bristol] Rogers provides a brief review of sweet taste and three hypotheses that have resulted in claims that LCS may not be beneficial in weight gain. While preference for sweet taste is inborn, the function for human liking of sweet taste is less clear. Some hypothesize a newborn\u2019s preference for sweet taste ensures adequate intake while it is unclear why preference for nutrients with higher caloric density is not primary. Efforts to better understand sweet taste have used various sweet compounds while other studies have explored the relationship between sweet taste and food intake based on these three hypotheses:<\/p>\n