{"id":17135,"date":"2019-05-21T12:44:43","date_gmt":"2019-05-21T16:44:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/caloriecontrol.org\/the-effect-of-a-new-mixture-of-sugar-and-sugar-alcohols-compared-to-sucrose-and-glucose-on-blood-glucose-increase-and-the-possible-adverse-reactions-a-phase-i-double-blind-three-way-randomized-cross\/"},"modified":"2019-07-09T19:03:58","modified_gmt":"2019-07-09T23:03:58","slug":"the-effect-of-a-new-mixture-of-sugar-and-sugar-alcohols-compared-to-sucrose-and-glucose-on-blood-glucose-increase-and-the-possible-adverse-reactions-a-phase-i-double-blind-three-way-randomized-cross","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/caloriecontrol.org\/the-effect-of-a-new-mixture-of-sugar-and-sugar-alcohols-compared-to-sucrose-and-glucose-on-blood-glucose-increase-and-the-possible-adverse-reactions-a-phase-i-double-blind-three-way-randomized-cross\/","title":{"rendered":"The effect of a new mixture of sugar and sugar-alcohols compared to sucrose and glucose on blood glucose increase and the possible adverse reactions: A phase I double-blind, three-way randomized cross-over clinical trial"},"content":{"rendered":"
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr.<\/em> 2019. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.endinu.2018.12.008<\/p>\n Mohsenpour MA, Kaseb F, Nazemian R, et al.<\/p>\n Download Research Study PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Objective<\/strong><\/p>\n Background<\/strong><\/p>\n Methods<\/strong><\/p>\n Findings<\/strong><\/p>\n Conclusions<\/strong><\/p>\n Points to Consider<\/strong><\/p>\n The post The effect of a new mixture of sugar and sugar-alcohols compared to sucrose and glucose on blood glucose increase and the possible adverse reactions: A phase I double-blind, three-way randomized cross-over clinical trial<\/a> appeared first on FructoseFacts<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr. 2019. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.endinu.2018.12.008 Mohsenpour MA, Kaseb F, Nazemian R, et al. Download Research Study PDF Objective To examine the effect of a new mixture of sugars and sugar alcohol on the postprandial blood glucose levels and its possible gastrointestinal (GI) adverse reactions in human adults. Background Various compounds such as sugars, sugar alcohols […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":848,"comment_status":"close","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24,6,169],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n
\nexamine the effect of a new mixture of sugars and sugar alcohol on the
\npostprandial blood glucose levels and its possible gastrointestinal (GI)
\nadverse reactions in human adults.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\nalcohols and non-sugar compounds (stevia, xylitol, and aspartame) have
\nbeen introduced to induce the sweet taste in food industry.<\/li>\n
\nby mixing the following four sugars: lactose, fructose, sucrose, and
\nerythritol.<\/li>\n
\ninteract each other during absorption in the intestine and slowdown or
\nincrease each other\u2019s absorption, further research is needed regarding the
\nglycemic response and possible gastrointestinal adverse reactions associated
\nwith Lacritose.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\npatients and 20 healthy individuals, ages 20-60 (mean age = 40) were
\nenrolled between February and October of2016.<\/li>\n
\nclinical trial was conducted in which each participant served as his\/her
\nown control. After fasting overnight for at least 10 hours, participants
\nwere randomly given 300ml servings of three beverages containing 50g
\nglucose, sucrose and lacritose. Blood samples were collected before and
\nafterwards every 30 minutes for up to 2 hours. <\/li>\n
\nanthropometric assessments were conducted on each intervention day. A gastrointestinal reaction questionnaire,
\nwhich assessed pain in the stomach and abdomen, heartburn, reflux,
\nappetite, etc., was completed for each participant one day after the
\nintervention day by a trained nutritionist on the phone.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\nduring consumptions of lacritose compared to sucrose and glucose (mean\u00b1
\nstandard error (SE) for lacritose: 114.9 \u00b1 2.5, glucose:154.8 \u00b1 5.0,
\nsucrose: 134.3 \u00b1 4.0, P-value <0.001).
\nAlso the increasing of blood glucose at different times was
\nsignificantly different between the three drinks.<\/li>\n
\nhealthy subjects, blood glucose was significantly lower after ingesting
\nlacritose when compared to other beverages, after adjustment for BMI,
\ngender, age and rolling method (P-value <0.05).<\/li>\n
\npain, epigastric pain and also nausea after ingestion of the test
\nbeverages were higher when they ingested lacritose. However the difference between beverages
\nwere not statistically significant for abdominal pain (P-value = 0.165),
\nepigastric pain (P-value = 0.097) and nausea (P-value = 0.717).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\nafter ingestion of one 50 g dose of lacritose, as compared to identical servings
\nof glucose and sucrose.<\/li>\n
\ngastrointestinal adverse reactions after its ingestion was not
\nsignificantly different compared to glucose and sucrose.<\/li>\n
\nexamining the long-term effects of lacritose on appetite, body weight and
\nother metabolic markers of long-term glucose control are recommended.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\nparticipants and did not assess the effect of lacritose on appetite, insulin
\nresponse and long-term outcomes.<\/li>\n
\nhealth are unknown and given its relatively high amount of lactose and
\nerythritol, they may be adverse reactions associated with long-term use. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n