{"id":17224,"date":"2019-06-20T14:55:21","date_gmt":"2019-06-20T18:55:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/caloriecontrol.org\/?p=17224"},"modified":"2022-07-19T15:58:30","modified_gmt":"2022-07-19T19:58:30","slug":"low-calorie-sweeteners-are-safe-no-increase-in-stroke-risk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/caloriecontrol.org\/low-calorie-sweeteners-are-safe-no-increase-in-stroke-risk\/","title":{"rendered":"Low Calorie Sweeteners Are Safe and Do Not Increase Your Risk of Having A Stroke"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

By Keith Ayoob, EdD<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

As a clinician of some 30+ years, I doubt I\u2019ve seen a\nnutrition issue more polarizing than that of low-and no- calorie sweeteners (LNCS).  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

You may have read sensational headlines about these\nsweeteners.  You should<\/em> also be hearing about their benefits, but alas, good news\nnever sells.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Example: a recent study in the journal Stroke<\/a><\/em> looked\nat the \u201cassociation\u201d between LNCS-containing beverages and the risk of stroke,\ncoronary heart disease and \u201call-cause mortality\u201d, the latter meaning\nessentially death for any reason at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The study focused on the consumption of artificially-sweetened\nbeverages (ASBs) in over 82,000 women who were part of the Women\u2019s Health\nInitiative Observational Study (WHIOS).  The\nwomen were enrolled quite a while ago, between 1993 and 1998, then followed for\n12 years.  They reported their ASB intake\nonly ONCE \u2013 3 years after their initial enrollment. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

This study is \u201cobservational\u201d, as no intervention was involved.  Studies like the WHIOS generate huge\ndatabases, are relatively easy to do and don\u2019t tend to cost much, given the\nnumber of research publications they can produce. However, this kind of data\nalso has serious limitations (think \u201cfine print\u201d) to it.  Read on.               <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The authors acknowledged the following limitations of the\nstudy:<\/p>\n\n\n\n