{"id":17275,"date":"2019-07-23T12:28:33","date_gmt":"2019-07-23T16:28:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/caloriecontrol.org\/short-term-isocaloric-intake-of-a-fructose-but-not-glucose-rich-diet-affects-bacterial-endotoxin-concentrations-and-markers-of-metabolic-health-in-normal-weight-healthy-subjects\/"},"modified":"2019-07-23T12:39:27","modified_gmt":"2019-07-23T16:39:27","slug":"short-term-isocaloric-intake-of-a-fructose-but-not-glucose-rich-diet-affects-bacterial-endotoxin-concentrations-and-markers-of-metabolic-health-in-normal-weight-healthy-subjects","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/caloriecontrol.org\/short-term-isocaloric-intake-of-a-fructose-but-not-glucose-rich-diet-affects-bacterial-endotoxin-concentrations-and-markers-of-metabolic-health-in-normal-weight-healthy-subjects\/","title":{"rendered":"Short-Term Isocaloric Intake of a Fructose- but not Glucose-Rich Diet Affects Bacterial Endotoxin Concentrations and Markers of Metabolic Health in Normal Weight Healthy Subjects"},"content":{"rendered":"
Mol Nutr Food Res,<\/em> 2019; \/\/doi: 10.1002\/mnfr.201800868 <\/p>\n Nier A, Brandt A, Rajcic D, et al.<\/p>\n Download Research Study PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Objective<\/strong><\/p>\n Background<\/strong><\/p>\n Methods<\/strong><\/p>\n Findings<\/strong><\/p>\n Conclusions<\/strong><\/p>\n Points to Consider<\/strong><\/p>\n The post Short-Term Isocaloric Intake of a Fructose- but not Glucose-Rich Diet Affects Bacterial Endotoxin Concentrations and Markers of Metabolic Health in Normal Weight Healthy Subjects<\/a> appeared first on FructoseFacts<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Mol Nutr Food Res, 2019; \/\/doi: 10.1002\/mnfr.201800868 Nier A, Brandt A, Rajcic D, et al. Download Research Study PDF Objective To determine if an isocaloric exchange of complex carbohydrates with fructose or glucose affects surrogate markers of liver health and vascular endothelial function in healthy normal weight young male and female adults. If so, the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":848,"comment_status":"close","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24,6,169],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n
\n determine if an isocaloric exchange of complex carbohydrates with fructose
\n or glucose affects surrogate markers of liver health and vascular endothelial
\n function in healthy normal weight young male and female adults. If so, the
\n goal is to whether these effects are related to changes in markers of
\n intestinal permeability like bacterial endotoxin and lipopolysaccharide
\n binding protein (LBP).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\n barrier function are thought to be critical in the development of
\n metabolic impairments.<\/li>\n
\n pair-feeding models also suggest that consumption of fructose, particularly
\n in combination with saturated fat, may be critical in the development of
\n NAFLD, vascular dysfunction and hypertension.<\/li>\n
\n studies in healthy humans show contradictory results regarding the effects
\n of fructose on liver, which may be due marked differences in study design
\n and duration. Further, data on the effects on vascular endothelium in
\n humans to our knowledge are lacking. \n <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\n were enrolled in the study, and after three participants dropped out, only
\n 12 subjects were included in the final analysis.<\/li>\n
\n for 4 days, which was based their individual caloric needs and the
\n recommendations of the German Society of Nutrition. This was followed by a
\n diet in which complex carbohydrates were either exchanged with fructose or
\n glucose (25% of total energy intake) for 3 days.<\/li>\n
\n diets after being dietary standardized for 4 days starting with the
\n fructose intervention. Sugar interventions were separated by a washout
\n period of at least 3 weeks during which all participants consumed their
\n usual diet.<\/li>\n
\n 24-h recalls conducted by an experienced nutritionist before the study. Physical activity level was assessed
\n using the World Health Organization’s Global Physical Activity Questionnaire. Nutritional data and total energy
\n expenditure were analyzed using the computer software EBISpro.<\/li>\n
\n blood pressure were assessed at the beginning of the study, after
\n consuming the standard diets and after the intervention periods.<\/li>\n
\n endotoxin, liver transaminase and blood lipid concentrations were
\n analyzed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\n
\n study may provide additional support of the hypothesis that dietary fructose may be
\n critical in the development of NAFLD and vascular endothelial dysfunction
\n in humans and that, similar to the findings in animal studies, impairments
\n of intestinal barrier function and an increased translocation of bacterial
\n endotoxin may be critical.<\/li>\n
\n glucose may not have these effects on parameters related to liver and
\n vascular endothelial as well as intestinal barrier function.<\/li>\n
\n changing dietary pattern only for a few days may markedly impact liver,
\n vascular endothelial and intestinal barrier function. However, molecular
\n mechanisms involved and especially those underlying the effects of
\n fructose on intestinal barrier function need to be determined in future
\n studies.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\nyoung, healthy adults limits the generalization of this study’s findings.<\/li>\n
\nand liver health was not included in the present study, as each was assessed
\nvia surrogate markers. <\/li>\n
\nmostly prepared and consumed in the study center. This does not reflect
\nreal-world experience and results would likely differ in a more realistic
\nsetting. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n